post

Freshbooks Launches Benchmarking Service: SaaS Will Never Be the Same

Way back at the Office 2.0 conference FreshBooks CEO Mike McDerment dropped a bomb in the last 20 seconds in his presentation: being software as as service, they can aggregate customers’ data, categorize it by industry, size ..etc, and once they do that, why not turn it into a service, providing customers with their own performance metrics as well as benchmarking them against their peers.

A few months later, the Small Business Report Card service will launch tomorrow at the Web 2.0 Expo as well as online. The service will be free to all Freshbooks customers, who will:

  • all receive their own performance metrics, and
  • if they select their peer group based on (currently) 80 types of business / professions, geography and several other business criteria, they will also receive their relative position, “score-card” within that group.

The sample below is a mock-up of the actual Report Card, but is shows the initial metrics reported. Clearly, as they further enhance the program, there will be more and more criteria, and FreshBooks customers will have a say in what performance metrics they find valuable.

Remember, FreshBooks’ customers are mostly small businesses who don’t have an army of MBA-types crunch the numbers and look for business (in)efficiencies. In fact it’s probably fair to say some would not even know how to interpret the numbers, until they are put in prospective – hence the value of relative benchmarking.

But why will SaaS never be the same? This isn’t just about FreshBooks and its customers.

It’s *the* hidden business model enabled by SaaS. An opportunity not talked about, but so obvious it has to be on the back of all SaaS CEO’s mind. Benchmarking is a huge business, practiced by research firms like Forrester, Hoovers, Dunn and Bradstreet, as well as by specialized shops like the Hackett group – none of which are affordable to small businesses. More importantly, all previous benchmarking efforts were hampered by the quality of source data, which, with systems behind firewalls was at least questionable. SaaS providers will have access to the most authentic data ever, aggregation if which leads to the most reliable industry metrics and benchmarking.

Being pioneers always carries a risk, and clearly, Freshbooks will have to keep an eye on their customers feedback. There may be a backlash due to data privacy/ownership concerns; some customers will not opt in, they may even lose some customers entirely. But I believe the majority will see the light and benefit from the service. If Mike’s blog post on the subject is any indication, the feedback there was overwhelmingly positive, with 13 comments for, 3 against.

I suspect a year or two from now benchmarking based on aggregate customer data will be standard industry practice, and little (?) FreshBooks will be looked upon as the pioneers who opened up the floodgate of opportunities.

Last, but not least a word on the creative launch – or a lesson on how to launch from a conference you don’t officially participate atsmile_wink:

Yugma is a web-conferencing company and an exhibitor at Web 2.0 Expo. What better way to demo a web-conferencing product than by showing real-live use… without Yugma having to move a finger to create content. They created Stage 2, a platform for companies to showcase their products remotely at the Yugma booth and simultaneously to the World through a Net broadcast. Both the presenters and Yugma win – congrat’s, and my personal Creativity Award to Yugma thumbs_up

Update (4/19): read Jeff Nolan’s comments.

Update (10/8/2008):  Congrat’s to Freshbooks for getting on  Fox Business.

post

Surprises @ Web 2.0 Expo

thumbs_up Surprise #1: It’s early Sunday morning, and there’s a huge crowd! Wow!   ExpoCal only showed a few dozen names for the Sunday sessions, so I figured this was just for the crazy-enthusiasts, the real crowd hits tomorrow.  It’s great to see so many participants. 

thumbs_down Surprise #2:  Registration is a disaster. A Case Study in how the best technology becomes worthless without the right process.  I’m guided in the pre-registered line, it goes quite fast, then in the data entry area I enter my name and click “print” to initiate printing my badge.  So far, so good: next step is another (not-too-long) line to actually pick up the badge. 

The line is somewhat pointless though, you have to wait till they call out your name. After 15 minutes or so, I do step up, and ask, only to find out, that if I checked in on any but the first three rows of computers, it goes to another bank of printers, at the other end of the check-in area, where all the crowd for on-site registration is. Great!  Nobody has told this before.

Over to the other line, nobody seems to have my badge, am told to wait till my name is called. I’m sure I was called earlier, someone must have picked it up, it’s been over 20 minutes now. After a while, I have a crazy idea: walk up to a computer again, let’s see if I can re-print my badge.  I shouldn’t be able to … but wow! it works!  Here we go: send to print again, and voila! I am called and have the badge in hands in 5 minutes.

Now I only have to walk back to the area where I started to pick up conference material .. then up to the workshop floor.  Dear organizers, despite Surprise #1 above, this is still just the rehearsal, tomorrow the real crowd arrives, you better fix this chaotic process.

Update: It’s Monday, the first full day, and I’m glad to see the problem fixed: there are clear signs that match the computer rows to the printers, registration is easy, no crowd to be found.

thumbs_down Surprise #3:  Web 2.0 needs connectivity, we all know that.  Wireless works, albeit sloooowly.  But…but: we need, power, too. I know, it’s my fault, should have carried extra batteries.. and there’s never enough power outlet for all attendees. But I haven’t been to any conference where’s not a single power outlet in the entire room. I’m sitting outside, next to a watercooler (which runs on power, so it led me to a spare outlet), trying to recharge my hungry laptop.  I’m afraid starting tomorrow, there will be tough competition for these spots.

That’s it for now, joining Ismael’s session.

Update, Monday: power still non-existent, wi-fi dying. It’s useless, and I’m sitting in the Mindtouch wiki session, where Ken  Lui just gave up trying to demo anything, due to poor connection.   Web 2.0 Expo with Web 0.5 connection:-(

 

post

Microsoft Patches Outlook, Creates PR Nightmare

Computerworld reports that Microsoft issued a patch to deal with Outlook 2007’s sluggishness, this time for real.

I can’t say that this will 100 percent solve the latency issues, but users should see a big improvement,” – says Jessica Arnold, Outlook’s program manager.

 Why won’t it solve the latency problems?  Because they were largely introduced by design changes to accomodate:

  • RSS handling – a new feature.
  • Indexing – fixing what hasn’t worked for years, i.e. finding email.

So, is Microsoft saying it’s the improvements that brought Outlook down to its knees? Ouchsmile_sad

Arnold said that while Microsoft had started hearing about problems even before Outlook’s release to businesses last November, “until we had enough users, the data wasn’t clear.”

Oh, I’ve got it now.  This is Microsoft’s way of becoming Web 2.0 complient: “Release early, release often” – don’t test, I might add.  Sorry Microsoft, this works for startups with early-adopter techno-enthusiast users, not for the corporate world’s #1 communication platform. And where’s the “Beta” moniker, anyway?

“Outlook wasn’t designed to be a file dump, it was meant to be a communications tool,”  – says Arnold, recommending users archive their email often, reducing the size of their .PST file.

Yeah, right. For years I bought into that, and was a religious auto-archiver.  There’s only one problem with that concept: we’re not storing old email for the sake of having it: it’s for the occasional need to actually find old information.  Have you tried to open an archive.pst file?  Since the contents are not kept up-to-date in your index, you can launch “find”, than take a coffee-beak.  Better yet, go for lunch.plate

Archiving, limiting storage was indeed the only solution for a long while.  But now there is a better one.  Ever since I’ve dumped Outlook, moved ALL my archives to Gmail, my PC is fast (desktop index, online backup, virus checker all have less to do) I have an efficient, fast email system, and can retrieve any email sent/received in the past ten years in a second.  That’s the real solution to Outlook’s performance problems.

I’ll take it one step further: for doc, spreadsheet, presentation needs I use the Zoho Suite.  Signing documents: EchoSign.  Incidentally, I am typing this on an offline editor, while sitting on BART, on my way to the first Web 2.0 Expo session: Ismael Ghalimi presenting how he runs his business entirely on Web-based services.

Update (4/16): Built For vs. Used For by Jeff Nolan.

post

FireFox Not Your Default Browser – After Windows Update… Again?

Another dose of Windows updates, exactly a week after the previous set, thank you Microsoft, I’m having funsmile_baringteeth

  • Security Update for Windows XP (KB931784)
  • Security Update for Windows XP (KB931261) 
  • Update for Outlook 2003 Junk Email Filter (KB932330) 
  • Security Update for Windows XP (KB930178) 
  • Security Update for Windows XP (KB932168)

Dear Microsoft, could you please kill he annoying pop-up that wants me to reboot every 15 minutes or so?  When you take weeks to fix bugs, the World will not come to an abrupt end if those updates take effect a few hours later.  I *own* this PC and it’s my time, when I already told it I would reboot later, stop bugging me!

OK, so I give up, rebooting now… back .. starting FireFox, the “usual” message: 

“FireFox is NOT your default browser … etc.”

Wait, I’m not falling for it.  After last time, both Microsoft and Mozilla contacted me, and together they determined that Microsoft did NOT hijack the browser, FireFox was indeed still the default browser, the problem was in a check that FireFox should not perform. 

While I can’t know what’s going on now, I suspect the ball may be in Mozilla’s court – time to reopen that bug report.

 

 

post

Webmail: PC Magazine Confuses Productivity with Popularity

PC Magazine compares the 3 major Webmail providers: AOL, Microsoft, and Yahoo!, and makes the summary call of declaring Gmail “left behind” – without reviewing Gmail.  How funny.

They key criticism is that – unlike the other three -, Gmail does not have the look-and-feel of Microsoft’s “killer” Outlook. Wow. That’s quite a statement.  I fail to see Outlook a killer product, it simply is a the dominant product on the market, and will remain so for quite a while simply due to Microsoft’s weight.  By the way, I recall the time when Lotus 1-2-3 was a market leader. Or Wordstar.  Or dBase II.

While not giving Gmail a dedicated review section, PC Mag refers to it as part of the discussion on Yahoo Mail:

Gmail, beta for life (or at least three years so far, is beloved by millions (including me), and still has cachet though it lacks AJAX features, isn’t easy to use, and doesn’t have a sensible sorting ability”

I agree and disagree. Yes, Gmail is not easy to use if you’ve just come from the world of Outlook, Yahoo..etc. No, Gmail is easy to use once you “get it” – in fact at that point you will start seeing just how hard-to-use the other products are.  

Sorting, for example is the “poor-emailer’s” tool for finding information.  You can spend looong minutes sorting, scrolling up-and-down, trying to piecemeal together a conversation thread from your Inbox, Sent Mail and various other folders.  Or you can just pull the entire thread up by smart use of labels and keyword search.  (of course in Outlook I would only attempt a search when it’s time for a coffee-break).

PC Mag talks a lot about drag-and-drop and other bells and whistles – I agree, these are nice, but when it comes to productivity, there are 3 fundamental reasons Gmail beats all:

  • Threaded Conversations: in business conversations last weeks, include dozens of emails, and are basically a pain to put together before you respond to someone.  Gmail handles it automagically, and as a side-effect, it presents a lot more information on it’s list screen – since the dozen individual emails are now compressed into one line.  (Oh, and don’t forget the nifty feature of picking up the first line of the email body, instead of dumbly repeating the subject line)
  • Labels.  Folders are a crime. How often do you feel the need to file an email to several folders, yet you can’t.  Logical grouping and physical storage of email have nothing to do with each other, need to be de-coupled, and that’s exactly what Gmail does.  You can assign multiple labels to any email, pull of conversation based on labels, and your labels can still give you a sense of ‘folders’ by having them listed on the left pane.
  • Search. Find. That simple.   I can pull up email on any subject from 1999 before you even start thinking of which folder to look into, how to sort, scroll in Outlook.

 

Does this make Gmail a better product?  Certainly, for me.  Perhaps not for you. 

Not everyone needs productivity.  Not everyone wants to go through a paradigm change.  AOL, YAHOO, Hotmail are the absolute market leaders,and they should do whatever it takes to keep their customers.  Their mainstream users are corporate employees who use Outlook in the Office, whether they like it or not is irrelevant, they are used to it. When they go home, they may not email a lot. Some will check their emails daily, once a week, or less. They want a personal email that resembles to what they already know.  Familiarity is more important than productivity.

Gmail is for the frequent users and increasingly for people who use it to conduct their business: in other words, the productivity-freaks like yours truly.  Or Web Worker Daily’s Anne Zelenka, who rightly states:   GMAIL: NOT BEHIND, JUST GOING IN A DIFFERENT DIRECTION.

 

Update: If you’re thinking of migrating to Gmail but can’t figure out how to deal with years of email history, check out my guide: How to Import All Your Archive Email Into Gmail.

Update: Webware reports on a prize fight between Yahoo Mail and Gmail.

 

post

Koral Acquired by Salesforce.com

Wow, this was fast. I met Koral CEO Mark Suster some time in November, when he gave me a demo of his then pre-beta Content Collaboration system. I instantly liked it, largely for it’s simplicity – hence the title of my review: Koral – Collaborative Content Management without the Hassle of “Management”.

Apparently I was not the only one who liked the productsmile_regular. Koral is no more. Salesforce.com has acquired it, launching its new service … hm, SalesforceContent, or Apex Content, or Salesforce ContentExchange – apparently there is a bit confusion over the name, but we’ll know it tomorrow for sure. The logo is from the (former) Koral site:

Update: Clarification from CEO Mark Suster:

“The overall initiative is called Salesforce Content. That consists of the Apex Content platform where developers will be able to build their own content based applications and Salesforce ContentExchange, which is a Web 2.0 application for managing corporate content that sits on top of this platform.
Basically, we took an integrated product, Koral, and split it out into a platform piece for developers and an application piece ready to sell to customers.

TechCrunch, Read/WriteWeb and ZDNet has all the details. Congratulations, Mark, Tim and the rest of the team!

post

Panda is Baaaack

And it’s an ugly one. For a second when I saw the Infoworld article, I thought it was Panda Software again.

I had a little clash wit Panda, makers of anti-spam software over – would you guess? – spamming me unstoppably.  It was so bad that even after a PR manager from Panda contacted me and personally intervened the spam would not stop.

Eventually I find a solution: set up an autofilter to forward the Panda-spam to the manager in question (poor victim) and delete my own copy.  

Learning from this I came up with a creative way to fight at least some of the spam we all receive.  It only works with otherwise legitim products where you can identify not the spammer, but the company whose product or service is being pushed.  Find the email address of a company executive; send a polite email telling them from now on you will forward all their spam until they can stop it; then set up an autofilter to do just that: forward all spam to the individual’s email address, deleting the original from yours.

(Please note, I’ve only said it’s a creative way, as a theoretical approach,  I have no clue about legal ramifications, therefore am not recommending you follow this method)

This time around Panda is a different beast though: it’s a worm, the creator of which is now arrested in China. To make amends, he agreed to release the removal software.  Only problem is: it does not work.  I guess it easier to cause damage then fix it.

The “authority” that determined the worm-removal software is useless was none other but Anti-virus maker … Symantec.  Now, wouldn’t it be a nice way to make amends for “old crimes” if Panda Software came up with the way to kill the Panda Burning Incense worm? smile_speedy

Update (4/19): Now, a third kind of Panda is here, too. But this one is better 🙂 

post

How to Import All Your Archive Email Into Gmail

Update (10/24/2007): This post has become unexpectedly popular. After 12K page visits on day one, half a year later it still receives 5-600 visitors every day. However, now that Gmail supports IMAP, it has mostly become obsolete, so I suggest you read my Simplified Guide to Importing All Your Archive Email Into Gmail instead.

This post still has value, mostly in the comments section, where 120 or so readers help out each other on numerous related issues.

The original post:

I finally got sick of all the problems with Outlook, bit the bullet and transferred all my historical email online. Having spent a few days using “native” Gmail (vs. POP to Outlook) I already feel a lot more productive. Ironically I’m writing this on the very day when Yahoo announced unlimited storage – but I’m with Mike on this: message threading, labels and powerful search still make Gmail (the Google Apps flavor) the best choice for me. At least for now – but I keep an eye for the next incarnation of another product – will name it in due course (if you guessed which one, you’re probably right smile_shades).

Migrating to a new email service wouldn’t be complete if you couldn’t move all your old “baggage” with you. Apparently this is a burning problem for many, as a year-old post I wrote on the subject is one of my most popular hits ever. Back then I was still happily (?) POP-ing it down to Outlook, but wanted a fast all-in-one searchable archive, and Gmail was the perfect solution. But none of the solutions were perfect – until now. There are several “gmail-loader” tools on the Net, but some simply don’t work, others change the original sender information to the email account they use for the transfer – pretty bad, IMHO. My simple solution a year ago was using Thunderbird with a redirect extension. You can read the steps to achieve this here. Even this solution wasn’t flawless: gmail listed all historical mail with the date of the transfer – the original date was sill preserved and searchable, you just got the list display messed up. This still appears to be the biggest hurdle users face according to this new discussion on Lifehacker.

The final solution comes from Google themselves: now that they quietly expanded Mail Fetcher to Google Apps accounts, and removed the “non-gmail source” restriction, there is a simple yet perfect two-steps process to get it all done. Gmail Mail Fetcher fixes the date problem, so now in two steps and using two email accounts you can get it all right.

Step 1: Load all your client-based email to a temporary Gmail account either using my Thunderbird procedure, or, for an easier and elegant solution, get hold of an IMAP account. Gmail does not support IMAP, but my old provider, 1and1.com is not a bad choice: 5 email accounts, 2G each with IMAP support $0.99 / month.

In Outlook (or whatever email client) set up an IMAP account according to the instructions from your online provider. Then folder by folder copy all email into the Inbox on the newly created IMAP account. Don’t forget your Sent Mail folder: yes, that goes into the IMAP Inbox, too. Open all your archives and repeat the same process. Don’t worry if it takes a wile: Outlook doesn’t simply copy between local folders, it shoots up all your email to your temporary IMAP server on the web, and you’ll be constrained by your upstream speed (typically lower than downstream). If you have a spare PC, it’s a good idea to use that one.

Step 2: Now that your email is online, make sure POP access is enabled from your temporary account. If this is a gmail account (not IMAP), this is the setting you need:

“Enable POP for all mail (even mail that’s already been downloaded)”

Then in your Gmail target account – the final destination where you want to have all your archive mail – set up Gmail Mail Fetcher to pick up all mail from your temporary account. The dates will magically be fixed!

Here are Google’s instructions on setting up Mail Fetcher. Do NOT check the button for “Leave a copy of retrieved messages on the server” – you do want Mail Fetcher to “eat” them all from the temporary account, in fact that will be one of your indicators that the transfer is finished. Be prepared for a slow process – Gmail will poll your temporary account at 60-90 minute intervals, fetching 200 emails at a time. At Settings > Accounts you can follow the progress, but ignore the “nnn mails remaining” indicator, as it’s totally wrong. When all done, don’t be alarmed that the number of fetched emails is less than what you started with: your email client (and the IMAP server) counted individual emails, while Gmail will group them into thread, and reports the thread count, which could be significantly lower.

Last, but not least a word on labels / categories: if you nicely organized your Outlook archive in folders, Gmail has no way to preserve that structure. The trick here is to do Steps 1 and 2 in iterations, completely transferring one folder at a time. Then you can set a label for all your fetched email to match the original Outlook folder, and keep on changing it folder by folder.

Finally there is the issue of backup: after all we heard of disappearing Gmail… If you trust Gmail, just worried about what may happen to your individual account, there is always the option of setting up a shadow-gmail account which will fetch everything from your primary one. If you want a local archive, “just in case”, either run Outlook to periodically POP your mail down, or I believe Thunderbird has a plugin that allows it to be minimized to the system tray permanently and check the POP server in the background.

Update (3/28): One potential problem I forgot to mention is that all the fetched email becomes “unread”. Hard to believe, but Gmail does not have a “set all read” feature, and while there are some scripts, I’ve read stories of user accounts being suspended for 24 hours for scripting activity. If anyone has an idea how to changed all mail to “read” please comment below, I’ll bring it up here. Thanks.

Update to the update: The solution comes from Jason Brown, and it’s a surprise: Gmail has added a trick, I have no idea when. In Inbox (or wherever the messages are) choose “Select: All” from the list just above the message list. That will select all of the messages that are visible in the list – but here’s the surprise: At the top and bottom of the list where so it used to only say “All 100 conversations on this page are selected”, there is an additional clickable message: “Select all xxxx conversations in Inbox”, which will in fact select *all* the messages in the Inbox. Then choose “Mark as read” from the “More actions…” drop-down list. Job done! You can do this on Inbox, labels, or if you select All Mail, then on the entire account in a single step. Thanks, Jason!

Somewhat related: The Yahoo Mail announcement (unlimited storage) is picking up steam on Techmeme: Google Blogoscoped, PC World: Techlog,Techdirt, Google Operating System, Monkey Bites, CyberNet Technology News, michael parekh on IT, PaulStamatiou.com, Web Strategy, Download Squad, WebProNews, franticindustries, The Webpreneur, Search Engine Land, Liquidmatrix Security Digest, Conversion Rater, larry borsato, Gizmodo, CrunchGear, CenterNetworks and parislemon

Update (4/7): It’s somewhat obvious, but here’s a tip for backing up your archive online: create another (a third, fourth ..etc) Gmail account, configure Mail Fetcher there with your main account as the source, and voila! – you have a second, third..etc backup copy of all your email. I felt the need to spell this out upon reading Using Google Groups To Backup Gmail by The Google Tutor. It’s an interesting concept and nicely written up, but I think it’s built on fundamentally flawed logic:

  • If you’re worried about losing content in your particular gmail account, why not get a second /third backup as I described above? You have the full gmail functionality, which you don’t get with Groups.. What’s the chance of losing all the accounts at the same time? Besides, this method will backup your “Sent” mail, too, which forwarding to Groups can’t help with.
  • On the other hand, if you’re worried about Google in general, then why trust yet-another Google service? Groops is no safer than Gmail in that case.
post

"Windows Update Disables Firefox" Issue Resolved

My Windows Update Disables Firefox as Default Browser post was read by over ten thousand readers just here on the blog, and I can’t even follow secondary sources, as it got reposted in several other blogs, hit the front page of reddit …etc.

Best of all though was a private email inquiry I received from Gary Schare,Director, Internet Explorer Product Management at Microsoft.   I gave him all the information I could, the MS team then tracked down the issue, and found that FireFox was still the default browser after the update, but it’s checking mechanism thought it wasn’t.  Apparently the fix was on Mozilla’s side, and Microsoft and Mozilla have worked together in resolving the issue.

I have to say I find Microsoft attention, as well as the two organizations collaboration exemplary.  The full story is best explained by quoting Gary verbatim – thanks for agreeing to it.

“Hi Zoli,

Thanks for providing the information on the updates you installed before experiencing the Firefox default browser prompt.  We did a thorough investigation and have tracked down the cause of the issue. Before I explain the actual cause, I do want to let you know that we also determined that at no time did Firefox ever stop being the default browser on the machine. It mistakenly thought it was no longer the default and prompted users, but every entry point that triggered the default browser would still launch Firefox.

This issue is actually the result of a change in Firefox (added in Firefox v 2.0.0.2) and how it responds to Office changing a Windows registry key during the updating process.  Whenever Office updates, it also verifies that many supporting registry keys are set to expected values (this is the same action that occurs when you use the “Detect and Repair” functionality in Office).  The modification of registry keys during updating has happened throughout the lifecycle of Office 2003, and the Outlook Junk Email Filter delivered via Microsoft Update this month triggered this issue simply because it was the first update of Office since Firefox 2.0.0.2 became available, not because this specific update did anything differently.

On the basis of your report, the Office team has worked with Mozilla and believe they’ve arrived at an answer that will address the issue.  The Mozilla folks have told us that the change will be in an upcoming version of Firefox, and it is tracked in this bug report on the Mozilla site.  Thanks again for bringing this to our attention. Your blog was the trigger of the investigation and we’re all glad we were able to find the solution so quickly.”

Nicely done.  Again, thanks for your attention and for fixing it.

 

post

Do We Need Another Web Meeting App?

Does the World need yet another “webex-killer“?  The answer is probably no. Other then Webex, whose name became a synonym to web-conferencing, there is  GoToMeeting, VyewTeamslide, DimDim  1videoconference , Vyew, Live Meeting, Thinkature and probably quite a few more I forgot about.

So why on Earth has Zoho announced Zoho Meeting, entering such a crowded market?  One answer is that it’s a “software-making machine”, turning out new product regularly, so why not … but I think there’s more.

Zoho Meeting has a few unique features, and as usual, TechCrunch provides a good review, so I won’t even attempt to “compete” with them.

smile_wink  I’d rather lament on what this really means.

After a year of pumping out standalone products ( I think the count is at 15 for now) this year Zoho will start focusing on tying them together.  This means integrating them, as well as some external products, create workflows and use some “glue” products in the process.  Mail, Wiki are such glue products (both are going through enhancements), and to some extent so is Meeting, as well as Chat.  They will enhance collaboration in context, while you work on your document, spreadsheet, presentation..etc.  The video below shows how Meeting is embedded in Zoho Show:

 

If you watched the video you may have noticed a spreadsheet in the background, while Raju was talking about embedding Meeting in Chat, which in turn will become part of all other applications. While the integration of Chat into Zoho Writer was somewhat of a non-event, I can give you a sneak preview of how it will work in Zoho Sheet, where the consequences are far more significant.

 

What this means is that Zoho Sheet, which recently added the capability to plot 21 different types of charts now supports real-time collaboration with instant updates on the individual cell level – this has been Editgrid’s competitive advantage so far.

This is just the beginning – keep an eye for Meeting, Chat and other “glue” products making our online life easier.

Last, but not least, several of the companies mentioned here will present at the Under the Radar Conference tomorrow, so if you have a free Friday, you may want to register here – today is the last chance to get $100 off.

(Disclosure: I am an Advisor to Zoho)