post

Under the Radar Office 2.0 Conference – Call for Companies

I agreed to be on the Selection Committee for the next full-day Under the Radar event by IBDNetwork. The focus will be Office 2.0  and 32 emerging startups will present on March 23, 2007, at the Microsoft campus in Mountain View, CA.  The categories are being finalized, but they likely are:

  • Organize – Tasks, Database, Project, Notes, Bookmarks
  • Collaborate – Groups, Wiki’s, Spreadsheets, Word Processing, File Sending, Document Mgmt
  • Track – Time, Expenses, Budgets, Accounting, HR
  • Publish – Blog platforms, Web publishing, Feeds/RSS, Content Management
  • Communicate – Email, IM, VOIP, Voice, web conferencing
  • Create – Presentation Mngr, music, photo edit/manage
  • Personalize – Desktop, Calendar, personal organizers
  • Search – vertical, social, create your own.

Although I’m a bit late (what a surprisesmile_embaressed) there are still a few days left for new submissions, so if you know a startup in the above categories, please recommend them either in a comment below or by emailing me

IBDNetwork’s criteria for selection:

  • Unique value proposition
  • Ability to monetize product/business
  • Must be solving a problem
  • Market opportunity
  • Must still be considered “under the radar”
  • Company must be a actual startup – not a new product from a large company.
  • Series A or less in funding
  • Beta and beyond – must have customers/users testing and/or using the product in the market

Thanks for your contribution!

 

post

What’s Hot And What’s Not For 2007 – SVASE Panel in Palo Alto

 • How much money is sitting on the sidelines, waiting to be invested?
• Where in the world will it go – Silicon Valley, India, China, somewhere else?
• How much will be available for seed and early stage investments?
• What will be the Hot market segments?
• What will be the Hot applications within these segments?
• Where will your money be going?

For answers to these and many other questions,  join us at a lively panel discussion moderated by VentureBeat‘s Matt Marshall this Thursday evening in Palo Alto.

The Panel:
• Ken Elefant, General Partner, Opus Capital
• Rob Rueckert, Senior Investment Manager, Intel Capital
• John Steuart, Managing Director, Claremont Creek Ventures
• Erik Straser, General Partner, Mohr Davidow Ventures
• Ann Winblad, Partner, Hummer Winblad Venture Partners

Schedule:

6.00-7.00 pm: Networking and Hors d’oeuvres
7.00-8:30 pm: Panel discussion and Q/A

For additional details and registration, see the SVASE site.  See you there! smile_regular

 

post

SVASE VC Breakfast with Gabriel Ventures: Sold Out

I’ll be moderating another SVASE VC Breakfast Club meeting this Thursday, Dec 21st in San Francisco.  As usual, it’s an informal round-table where 10 entrepreneurs get to deliver a pitch, then answer questions and get critiqued by a VC Partner. We’ve had VC’s from Draper Fisher, Hummer Winblad, Kleiner Perkins, Mayfield, Mohr Davidow, Emergence Capital …etc.

These sessions are a valuable opportunity for Entrepreneurs, most of whom would probably have a hard time getting through the door to VC Partners. Since I’ve been through quite a few of these sessions, both as Entrepreneur and Moderator, let me share a few thoughts:

  • It’s a pressure-free environment, with no Powerpoint presentations, Business Plans…etc, just casual conversation; but it does not mean you should come unprepared!
  • Follow a structure, don’t just roam about what you would like to do, or even worse, spend all your time describing the problem, without addressing what your solution is.
  • Don’t forget “small things” like the Team, Product, Market..etc.
  • It would not hurt to mention how much you are looking for, and how you would use the funds…
  • Write down and practice your pitch, and prepare to deliver a compelling story in 3 minutes. You will have about 5, but believe me, whatever your practice time was, when you are on the spot, you will likely take twice as long to deliver your story. The second half of your time-slot is Q&A with the VC.
  • Bring an Executive Summary; some VC’s like it, others don’t.
  • Last, but not least, please be on time! I am not kidding… some of you know why I even have to bring this up. (Arriving an hour late to a one-and-a-half-hour meeting is NOT acceptable.)

Thursday’s featured VC is Scott Chou, General Partner, Gabriel Venture Partners. For details and registration please see the SVASE site.    In appreciation of our 40% growth in membership during 2006, we are pleased to offer SVASE members free registration for VC Breakfast Club during December. Non-members will be able to register at the substantially discounted rate of $25. 

The above promotion brings up an issue: it’s easy to register for free events – please only do it if you really mean to attend. The registration system closes at 10 participants, depriving other entrepreneurs of the opportunity to join. (No walk-ins allowed).  So if you need to cancel, please notify us by email.

(Update: The event has sold out. We can not accomodate more participants, if you’re not on the list, please do not just show up – join us next year).

Here’s a participating Entrepreneur’s feedback about a previous event.

See you in San Francisco!Zbutton

 

 

post

And the Winner of the Weirdest Company Name Award is: Xeequa

I guess all the good names are really taken… but I’m sure by the time of his launch party, Axel will come up wih a better explanation for naming his “Channels On Demand” startup Xeequa

(The first result for this Google search might give a hint to the pronounciation).

 

post

IdeaWins: Apprentice the Microsoft Way

I’ve previously covered Microsoft’s Contest for Innovative Small Business Idea: basically a promotion for the new MS Office Accounting 2007 package, dressed up as a contest. Still, it’s an opportunity for entrepreneurs, especially those in retail.

Originally MS released the site in a rush and not all components were ready, so submissions were only by emailing a downloadable form. They’ve fixed it now, so here’s the new fancy interactive submission page.

Microsoft also picked “celebrity” judges, lead by Carolyn Kepcher of ex-Apprentice fame.  Now, here’s my challenge: try to find this information on the IdeaWins site smile_eyeroll.  I couldn’t. 

Why hire “stars” (just how much of a star she will be without The Donald is still to be seen…), and “hide” the fact?    I only know about it from an email by MS PR – or so I think, it came from a gmail (sic!) account.  The press release calls Carolyn’s appointment an “unprecedented move to galvanize the imagination of millions of Americans”.  Hm… I don’t know about galvanizing… perhaps I’d feel galvanized by the end of the video, but I admit I did not watch it all the way.  Why?  Because I generally prefer knowing what I am getting into upfront.   In my previous post I stated:  

 “the FAQ is actually all about the Accounting package, and the contest terms are somewhat hard to find.”  

Now it got worse.   There is a  contest-related FAQ – well-hidden, unless you use my direct link.  The real catch: this is only available from inside the interactive signup, *after* you have chosen the high-bandwidth option.  If you picked low-bandwidth, you’re out of luck – and info. smile_zipit.   A “good” example of bad design getting in the way of creativity.  Which is quite typical of  The Microsoft Way. smile_sad

 

 

post

SVASE VC Breakfast in San Francisco

I’ll be moderating another SVASE VC Breakfast Club meeting this Thursday, Dec 14th in San Francisco.  As usual, it’s an informal round-table where 10 entrepreneurs get to deliver a pitch, then answer questions and get critiqued by a VC Partner. We’ve had VC’s from Draper Fisher, Hummer Winblad, Kleiner Perkins, Mayfield, Mohr Davidow, Emergence Capital …etc.

These sessions are a valuable opportunity for Entrepreneurs, most of whom would probably have a hard time getting through the door to VC Partners. Since I’ve been through quite a few of these sessions, both as Entrepreneur and Moderator, let me share a few thoughts:

  • It’s a pressure-free environment, with no Powerpoint presentations, Business Plans…etc, just casual conversation; but it does not mean you should come unprepared!
  • Follow a structure, don’t just roam about what you would like to do, or even worse, spend all your time describing the problem, without addressing what your solution is.
  • Don’t forget “small things” like the Team, Product, Market..etc.
  • It would not hurt to mention how much you are looking for, and how you would use the funds…
  • Write down and practice your pitch, and prepare to deliver a compelling story in 3 minutes. You will have about 5, but believe me, whatever your practice time was, when you are on the spot, you will likely take twice as long to deliver your story. The second half of your time-slot is Q&A with the VC.
  • Bring an Executive Summary; some VC’s like it, others don’t.
  • Last, but not least, please be on time! I am not kidding… some of you know why I even have to bring this up. (Arriving an hour late to a one-and-a-half-hour meeting is NOT acceptable.)

Thursday’s featured VC is Jeremy Woan, CEO, Bampton Group. For details and registration please see the SVASE siteIn appreciation of our 40% growth in membership during 2006, we are pleased to offer SVASE members free registration for VC Breakfast Club during December. Non-members will be able to register at the substantially discounted rate of $25. 

The above promotion brings up an issue: it’s easy to register for free events – please only do it if you really mean to attend. The registration system closes at 10 participants, depriving other entrepreneurs of the opportunity to join. (No walk-ins allowed).  So if you need to cancel, please notify us by email.

Here’s a participating Entrepreneur’s feedback about a previous event.

See you in San Francisco!Zbutton

 

post

Google’s Unfair Advantage

(Updated)
Google’s Adwords is a fair system – with enough money you can outbid anyone and get top position … or .. can you?

Joe Kraus’s last blog post, It’s a great time to be an entrepreneur has become a much -quoted classic.  Part of his argument is how Search Engine Marketing changed everything, how one can now reach millions of small customers just buy buying the right keywords. Following this strategy a lot of startups spend most of their marketing budget to one company: Google.

Online collaboration company  Central Desktop followed the same path: frugal start and steady growth to profitability simply by having a solid good product and focused Adwords-based marketing. (They have  a really good integrated suite that I warmly recommend to small businesses as well as ad-hoc groups in need of  collaborative editing, groups, calendar, wiki, project management, tasks ..etc.)

It wasn’t until one of Central Desktop’s competitors, Joe Kraus’s very own JotSpot got acquired by Google that CEO Isaac Garcia started to investigate how Google plays its system against their own customers.

“You see, I’m not afraid of competing with Google – but I *AM* afraid of AdWords. Here is why……….
Google Cheats
Google holds the top advertisement (Adword) slot for the following key words:
intranet, spreadsheet, documents, calendar, word processor, email, video, instant messenger, blog, photo sharing, online groups, maps, start page, restaurants, dining, and books (somehow Amazon has managed to appear in the #1 ad slot for ‘books’).
For
spreadsheet, blog and video, in addition to squatting the premium ad position, Google Products also dominate three of the first four search results.
In such cases, Google Product Links and Ads can account for up to 25% of your viewable screen resolution – 30-40% for lower screen resolutions – almost guarantying that users will click on a Google Product over any other search results, sponsored links or text ads.
What this tells me is if you are trying to advertise a product that is competitive to Google, then you’ll never be able to receive the Top Ad Position, no matter how much money you bid and spend.

How successful do you think *your* ad buys would be if your competitor trumped your position no matter how high you bid your key words? “

His three questions to Google:

“1. How much does Google pay *itself* to claim the top ad position for searches relevant to its own products?
2. Does Google hold itself to the same minimum CTR thresholds for Ads placed?
(In case you aren’t aware – Google recently changed its Landing Page criteria; increasing keyword buys to $5.00, $10.00, $15.00+ for companies who’s Ads were not meeting a minimum (unknown) CTR.)
3. What alterations does Google make to its search algorithm to guarantee top rank for search results relevant to its own products?”

I think Isaac hit on something really big here:

“In the beginning, AdWords was hailed as the revolutionary platform that enabled small start-ups, mom and pop stores and businesses all around the world to ‘compete fairly in an open market bid system.’ It was written that “small businesses can now compete evenly with big business – it levels the playing field.””

Yes, it levels the playing field – as long as Google itself has no interest in your particular field.  So if you’re a small business owner, startup entrepreneur, how safe are you?  Today you don’t compete with Google, but considering Google’s appetite for acquisitions chances are tomorrow you will.  Is Google abusing its monopoly *against* you?

Update (11/8): The Inside Adwords blog responds:

“…our ads are created and managed under the exact same guidelines,principles, practices and algorithms as the ads of any other advertiser. Likewise, we use the very same tools and account interface. As does any advertiser, we aim to give our campaigns a budget which is in line with their value to us in terms of the increased traffic we might see. We actively monitor and manage the success of our ads by adjusting ad copy, keywords, bids, and so forth in the same way any advertiser who is concerned with their account performance would. That said, there are no special buttons to push or levers to pull that give our internal account managers special treatment or leverage.

Well, if I want to absolutely win a $10 item on eBay, I may auto-bid generously… $12, $15?   I certainly won’t bid $100.  Not that the price would reach $100, but eBay’s system will keep me in the winning position against all other bidders, who in a crazy bidding frenzy might drive my price up to .. $20? $30?  And, this being real money, I’d have to pay “too much”, above the value of the item.  Of course, if eBay as a company was bidding against me, they could afford that $100, or even $1000 bid – after all, it’s only “funny money”, just like Google bidding for Adwords.
Or, as ZDNet puts it:

“A Google AdWords self-promotion at Google.com, however, IS unique in a key way; The house is playing against the paying players.”

Update (11/8): Nick Carr’s When the auctioneer bids is a must-read.

Update (12/20): “Google recently emphasized they need to pay the same budgets as everyone else to advertise on Google using AdWords. What they might not have told us is that Google might simply not use AdWords in the first place… and instead, display a graphical “tip” Onebox on top of the organic results.”  Full story on Google Blogoscoped.

Update (7/7/2008)Ross Mayfield pondering on why he always gets outbid by Google.

post

Things to Avoid If You’re Planning an Embezzlement Scheme

  • Do not call your company VaporTech. In fact do not call it Vapor-anything.
  • Do not lease a Ferrari and a Mercedes at the same time
  • Do not hire a former prosecutor as a corporate officer.

Full story at the SF Chronicle.

 

post

SVASE: Alternative Exits for Technology Startups

Startup activity is at an all-time high, venture funding has soared, but something is still missing… the huge exits.  The IPO market simply doesn’t exist.  What are the alternative exit strategies for all that venture capital?

  • Acquisition by Google / Yahoo/ eBay ..etc?
  • IPO on a foreign Stock Exchange?
  • Go public through a reverse merger?  (yuck…)
  •  or…?

These are a few of the questions our excellent panel will discuss at the Alternative Exits For Technology Startups event organized by SVASE this Thursday, December 7 in Palo Alto.

The Panel:

  • Peter Rip, Managing Director, Leapfrog Ventures
  • Robert Simon, Director, Alta Partners
  • Ungad Chadda, Director, Listings, TSX Venture Exchange
  • Curtis Mo, Partner, WilmerHale
  • Neil Weintraut, Partner, Palo Alto Venture Partners

Moderator: Stephane Dupont, Executive Vice President, National Venture Capital Association.

For details, speaker bio’s and registration link please see the SVASE site. 

See you there!Zbutton

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

post

Atlassian Founders Become Australian Entrepreneur of the Year

My first thought was deja vu… I myself reported on Mike and Scott winning the E&Y Young Entrepreneur of the Year Award a few months ago. Then it hit me; this is not the *young* category; Mike Cannon-Brookes and Scott Farquhar won the real thing, Ernst & Young’s Australian Entrepreneur of the Year Award.

Now, if you first win the *young* category, then a few months later the *adult* one (not *that* way… ) does it mean you grew up quickly and are no longer young?smile_tongue

Joke apart, congrat’s to Mike and Scott, in fact the entire Atlassian team. They’ve built a remarkable company… when I first met them in the spring, they had about 50 employees, now it’s 70+, serving 5,000 customers in 65 countries. Their first hit was Jira, an issue management system, the second product, Confluence became the market leading enterprise wiki. Of course there are a number of ways to measure leadership, one being a feature-by-feature comparison, but at the end of the day, customers vote with their dollars, and Atlassian outsells their competition lumped together (including pre-Google JotSpot, amongst others).

Here’s a short video from the award ceremony.

Successful millionaires or not (Atlassian is self-funded), these guys remain humble and likeable; just read Mike’s post here. Oh, as for the likeable part, they hosted the Enterprise Irregulars, a few analysts and their own competitors to dinner, and did NOT use the opportunity to pitch us smile_shades

All that said, I have to warn anyone thinking of joining them … they are a dangerous bunch. smile_wink