post

The Blog Poll Platform You Should Avoid

(Updated)

Polls are an easy, simple way of getting immediate customer/reader feedback, and also letting the voters know what their community thinks.

There are a number of good products to chose from, like dPolls often seen on TechCrunch, the platform GigaOM is using (whatever it is), Blogflux and Majikwidget seen at Guy Kawasaki’s, PollDaddy used by the ReadWriteWeb …etc. I tend to use Zoho Polls, which, other than its native display also allows me to easily chart out the results using Zoho Sheet. All these apps have a clean interface, are easy to use and immediately display vote results right where you voted (in the blog).

The one you should avoid is Blogpoll. My friends at Atlassian put out a poll, and after voting, and a ridiculously looong wait, this is what I saw:

WTF… where’s my poll? Ahh, perhaps that blue bar that says “your title”? Yes. If you scroll down, you can actually see your poll results in a tiny box, surrounded by a jungle of advertising.

Now, I understand the economics of a free service, but guess what: when you overdo advertising so badly that customers have too look for what they came for … chances are, they won’t be repeat customers. And that’s the end of your service.

(P.S. Jon, I hope you’ll still invite me to the User Conference…)

Update (3/15): Jon is now running a poll on what’s the best poll software… cast your vote over at Atlassian.

post

StartupCrunch: Yet Another TechCrunch Clone

StartupCrunch.org appears to be another site that attempts to capitalize on TechCrunch’s popularity  (no link love from me, rel=nofollow).  They will promote any startups that pays €100 (100 Euros) and sends in a video pitch. 

The “secret sauce” is CrunchRank, but before you think it’s TechCrunch-meets-Digg, let’s look at how this “rank” is calculated: it is assigned by the reviewer, whose identity, just like anyone behind the site is unknown.

Why would anyone want to advertise on an anonymous site is beyond my comprehension – but hey, if they get 10 victims customers, they are already in the money. 

Business model aside, and whether Mike Arrington has any legal protection for the use of “Crunch” on websites, the name itself is a clear rip-off. Obviously, this site is in to make some quick money by implying association with TechCrunch.  I also seriously doubt the sponsors are real (I’m trying to verify this See Update below)- just look at the pixelated badges, they clearly were lifted from elsewhere.  My guess: this is just another attempt to legitimize the site.

The launch strategy so far appears to have two legs: a dozen or so blog posts, most (all?) of which are sponsored through pay-per-post, and – here comes the smart part – someone commenting on recent TechCrunch posts under the name StartupCrunch, of course with a link back to the site.

I expect this site to be fairly short-lived… which reminds me: perhaps it’s time to check on Arringtonsucks.com, an attack-site launched late January.  Well-well: last post dated February 15th – that’s a lifespan of … 3 weeks, if my math is correct.

smile_wink

 Update (3/14):  I’ve contacted two “sponsors”, Zoho and Vecosys.  Both confirmed that they had nothing to do with StartupCrunch, infact haven’t heard of this site at all. They both contacted StartupCrunch, which apparently complied with their demand to take off the fake sponsorship badges.  I don’t see the point in checking out all other “sponsors” – have seen enough already.

post

Zooomr Zoomed Out – Will Be Back as Mark III.

My favorite photo-site, Zooomr is down – but this time I don’t mind, as it will be back with a major upgrade – Mark III (whatever that is). Wunderkind-Founder Kristopher promises over 250 new features, and Unlimited storage and archival for all users — no limits on photo size, either!  (Oops, I’m no longer privileged as a blogger…)

Watch Kristopher’s video here – oh, boy, someone needs a lot more sleep!smile_yawn

 

 P.S. Wow, they finally listened to me smile_wink  and acquired Zoomr.com, which had been a typosquatting site for long.

 

post

Those Pennies Add Up

Any time Google makes an announcement, naysayers rush to say it’s the end of the smaller Office 2.0 players. I disagree: it’s not going to be a winner-takes-all market. There will be room for better, differentiated products, better customer service, possible white-label partnerships… Ahh, and talk about partnership: you can’t partner with Google – you can become a customer on their terms.

That said, not all startups survive: we’ve seen Kiko fold, and the iRows team joined Google when they ran out of cash. So it definitely does not hurt to have some longevity if you’re in this “game” for the long run.

Today a service I’ve been beta-testing and like a lot came out of beta: that means it’s fully available, and God Forbid smile_embaressed also charges a fee.

Site24x7 does what the name suggests: monitors your site’s availability, response times, and it also allows monitoring individual web transactions. You can predefine whether you’d like email or SMS alerts in case of outages. Below is a sample weekly (daily, if you prefer) report.

 

Actually, I lied above: the service does have a basic free level. But if you’d like monitoring frequency to be less than 60 minutes, you’ll find the Pro account is well worth it: fees start at 50 cents. Since this is not a user-based service, that means $.50, $1, $2 per site per month. I think it’s a no-brainer.

Why am I talking about it? Site24x7 is provided by a company named Adventnet. Their website is boring. But their product list is over a hundred items long. “Boring”, reliable, solid cash-cows. smile_wink Adventnet is not a startup by any means: they have been in business for ten years, organically growing to 600+ employees and millions of dollars in revenue (without outside investment).

They are the company behind Zoho. Now you know where Zoho’s longevity comes from. Those pennies add up.

(Disclaimer: I’m an Advisor to Zoho)

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

post

Radar Relay – What’s Happening in Office 2.0

I might as well have titled this post Radar Delay – first it was due last Friday, as part of series of reviews leading up to the Under the Radar: Office 2.0 event, but then fellow Enterprise Irregular Rod Boothby posted an “extra” article the same day, so I decided to wait till Tuesday. Yes that was yesterday, the day when Comcast, my ISP ironically responded to my push for On-Demand with a service outage.

smile_sad

But first things first: Web-based products received a surprise promotion from an unexpected source: Microsoft. As Phil Wainewright says on ZDNet:

“It’s astonishing that in the midst of a serious challenge from a new generation of Web-native office suites, Microsoft should give its rivals a helping hand by handicapping its own product so badly that it performs worse than an online product on a slow dial-up line.”

He is referring to the Outlook 2007 meltdown several users experienced:

You’d think I had just sprayed the inside of my poor mega-laptop with saltwater to induce non-stop fritzing. I’ve learned to meditate while Outlook ruminates over ten incoming POP messages of 69K. Perhaps it takes a few seconds over each incoming message or RSS feed to contribute to solving a Grand Challenge. Or it and Desktop Search have to play 333 iterations of rock-paper-scissors everytime a change has to be written

You can hardly accuse the above user with anti-Microsoft bias, since he is none other than Mini-Microsoft, who is obsessed with fixing Microsoft, the company. The Guardian, Dennis Howlett, Jason Busch, Tim Anderson, Chris Pirillo, Dan Farber, Phil Wainewright had similar experiences. Phil asks:

“But is it an even better fix to abandon Outlook and Exchange altogether and switch to an on-demand alternative?

My answer is a loud YES, and I’m making my point in Desktop Software: A Failed Model. Of course glitches occur in the On-Demand world, too, as we just witnessed Google Apps collapse soon after the announcement. We’re not quite there yet, but I share Rod Boothby’s view that we have passed a tipping point: while 2 years ago the ideal mix would have been desktop computing with additional online access, now I feel as a user I am better off mostly working online, with occasional offline access.

A somewhat doubtful friend, who happens to be the CEO of a cool company making web-based products sent this question:

“Do you really think people will use Word processors (in any significant number) through their web browser? “

Yes, I really do think, but why believe me? Listen to a US Government Agency instead: FAA May Ditch Microsoft’s Windows Vista And Office For Google And Linux Combo.

Some of the Under the Radar “Graduate Circle” sponsors posted significant news recently:

Talk about user base, Nielsen/NetRatings issued a press release claiming that Google Docs and Spreadsheets dominate web-based productivity tools since October, with a market share of 92 percent of unique visitors. Ismael Ghalimi did some research and proved them wrong concluding that Google’s market share may be closer to 50%. His take:

It is actually quite amazing that companies like ThinkFree and Zoho, with their ridiculously small marketing budgets, can play in the same league as mighty Google.”

Ismael is the creator of last years successful Office 2.0 Conference, and he is already preparing for Office 2.0 2007. But that’s in September – first we’ll have an exciting full-day conference:

Under the Radar: Why Office 2.0 Matters on March 23rd, in Mountain View, CA. Here’s the updated agenda and a list of presenting companies:

Approver | Blogtronix | Brainkeeper | Cogenz | ConceptShare | ConnectBeam | Diigo | EditGrid | Firestoker | InvisibleCRM | Koral | Longjump | Mashery | My Payment Network | Proto Software | Scrybe | Sitekreator | Slideaware | Smartsheet | Spresent | Stikkit | System One | Terapad | Teqlo | TimeSearch Inc. (Calgoo) | Tungle | Vyew | WorkLight | Wrike | Wufoo | Xcellery

The Conference is put up by DealMaker Media, which was until recently known as IBDNetwork. (Too bad I missed their Launch Party.)

Hope to see you there!

Update (3/09): Passing the baton to Stowe Boyd, here’s his Relay post.

post

Anne 2.1 Pro

Anne Zelenka just incremented her version number, announcing Anne 2.1 pro.

Me, I’m staying with 3.0 smile_tongue

post

Technorati Still Needs a White Knight

I’ve complained so much about Technorati‘s non-performance, it’s getting boring.”  – This is a quote from a post I wrote 9 month ago.  Nothing changed since then.   They keep on changing the humorous (?) error messages:

Doh! The Technorati Monster escaped again.

No, sorry guys, it’s not a Monster. Perhaps a Snail.  A Turtle at max.   

I recognize Technorati for being innovators in the Blogosphere,  and I prefer using it for the features.  But there is one “feature” where Google Blog Search wins: it works.  All the time.   Technorati is dead more often than not, and even when it’s “alive”, it’s barely crawling.

Technorati is clearly an IP company ( a damned good at that) that cannot cope with the infrastructure requirements of the growing Blogosphere.  Isn’t there a White Knight out there that would acquire them and save us all from this slow suffocation?

Update: Wow, quite a coincidence:  Read/WriteWeb is discussing Technorati’s exit options today. 

 

post

Conservapedia: an Exclusionist Wikipedia-Clone

And I thought Wikipedia’s deletionists were exclusionist. Oh, boy, was I wrong… the real exclusionists created their own Wikipedia-clone:

Conservapedia is a much-needed alternative to Wikipedia, which is increasingly anti-Christian and anti-American… Conservapedia is an online resource and meeting place where we favor Christianity and America.”

How can it possibly be an objective source of  “historical, scientific, legal, and economic topics” by excluding the views of the majority of the World?

As for Christianity and America, I hate to bring this to the Conservafolks, but Christianity really, really did not originate in America.  Not that Conservapedia’s entry on Christianity explains anything – you’ll have to check out Wikipedia for that. 

Conservapedia doesn’t fare any better on the *minor* [sic] contribution to history, science, culture, architecture ..etc by pre-Christian civilizations like Egypt, China, Greece ..etc.  For example here’s the entire entry on Egypt:

“The oldest non-nomadic civilization in the world which still exists today. Egypt is located in north-east Africa.  ”

Greece does not do any better:

The collective term for the civilizations of the Greek subcontinent.”

Nice. Concise?  Pathetic.

 

Conservapedia started as a school project.  (Again, we have to visit Wikipedia, not Conservapedia to learn this).  I’m sure eliminating diversity, filtering out most of the World’s knowledge is the best way to improve our kids’ education.  As if America were not already falling behind in education. My advice to the Conservafolks: get Senator Ted Stevens on board.

 

post

The Web’s Top 50 by PC World

Despite what Time Magazine says, *WE* are not the most important people on the Web. PC World has just published the list of The 50 Most important people on the Web.

Topping the list is the Google Triumvirate – no surprises there.  Steve Jobs in the #2 slot?  Hm, I don’t know… and BitTorent #3?

I’m certainly happy to see Wikipedia Founder Jimmy Wales in the 5th position and Craig(slist) Newmark in no 7.  To be fair, I am biased, happy for them, not sure whether those are the right slots …

Youtube’s Chad Hurley and Steve Chen are #10 – but wait, they are now a Yahoo property, and their “owners” (Oops, my bad, pre-coffee mistake, of course Gootube is part of Google… thanks to Christopher for correcting me) , Jerry Yang, David Filo, and Terry Semel only come in slot #19!

On a personal note, I’m glad to see several blogging personalities recognized, including Robert Scoble (Scobleizer),  Mike Arrington (TechCrunch),  Dave Winer (Scripting News) as well as those who significantly contributed to the blogging infrastrucure: Matt Mullenweg (WordPress), Kevin Rose (Digg), Gabe Rivera (Techmeme), Rob Malda (Slashdot).

Now, of course if PC World really wanted to live up to the Open Web, they would have concluded the article with an open poll, letting *us* come up with our own ranking….

Related posts: HipMojo.com, Guardian Unlimited, Blogtronix , Now I Have a Blog Too ,

Good Morning Silicon Valley, WOW Insider, Rex Hammock’s weblog, Scobleizer, Mark Evans, 901am, and The Other Here

Update (3/05): A funny quirk on Techmeme: The Yahoo News version of  the PC World article gets all the exposure while PC World’s own blog entry that points to the article sits separated in an obscure corner. Update to the update: they are now merged.

Tags: , , ,

post

Why I’m NOT Writing about Google Apps

Of course it’s a significant  move.  Not that it happened today… or was unexpected.  It’s been evolving in front of our eyes, the significant news IMHO is not the pricing, but the Service Level guarantee of 99.9%.

(Well, on second thought, there is a surprise: where is JotSpot?)

But is there anything else to discussNot really, already dozens of posts appeared, and before  you know TechMeme will become useless for the next two days, as it will be completely overwhelmed with me-too posts on the Google announcement.

I’ve actually been planning a more speculative post on Google’s foray into the SMB Business Applications market, but that will now have to wait for the echo to die off….

Update: Hehe .. Robert got to the same conclusion.  

Update (2/22):  Sound of reality from Zoho’s CEO:

“Our business plan is not based on us beating Microsoft or Google, it is based on serving customers well enough to earn a profitable share of the market. Business is not superbowl, though it often appears that way in a 24×7 news cycle. It is perfectly possible for a smaller company to offer a compelling product to customers and earn a perfectly good living, without “winning” the market.”